Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re^2: What is Enterprise Software?

by Jenda (Abbot)
on Oct 31, 2005 at 14:50 UTC ( #504276=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: What is Enterprise Software?
in thread What is Enterprise Software?

CQ? I pity you! I've seen that beast and I don't think you can get anything worse. The "designer" was definitely insane, if there ever was one. I'm really glad I'm one of the very few developers in the company that doesn't have to "use" it (often).

And as far as the "support" goes, let include a quote from my conversation with someone near the top management:

The people who own it are insane too because I remember Xxx talking about their "support" plan
they don't support it :-O
they probably don't have anyone capable of supporting it. I remember Xxx telling me how she would figure out the issues and solve them herself and they would be amazed, kind of like "wow, so that's how you do it".
Yeah, enterprise, that's what it is.

XML sucks. Badly. SOAP on the other hand is the most powerfull vacuum pump ever invented.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: What is Enterprise Software?
by jdporter (Canon) on May 22, 2008 at 19:25 UTC

    Really? That's your experience? Mine is about 180 degrees different. Admittedly, my situation was a pretty unusual one, working for a company that paid the $$$$$ for top-grade support from Rational. But we had Rational engineers (CC and CQ experts, respectively) on site two days a week and always on call. I learned a lot from them (as well as from the on-line resources) about how these products work, and I personally can't praise them enough. Yes, there's some complexity; yes, the products have some quirks and warts; yes, there's a substantial learning curve. In an enterprise environment, you should expect to, and shouldn't be afraid to, climb that curve. The payoff is a suite of powerful, "enterprise grade" tools you can exploit in taming your change management dragons. None of the open source tools I've encountered come close to the depth and breadth of power available in the Rational tools.

    A word spoken in Mind will reach its own level, in the objective world, by its own weight

      Maybe they got better later. Or maybe your company paid more $ than mine.

      As I said I did not have to use it often, I guess maybe three times or something, but it was enough. I don't know what does the current interface look like, but the version I have seen was simply ... interesting. Eg. the form for entering an issue resolution was insanely long so you kept on entering and selecting and checking and clicking and scrolling down until everything looked like it was there ... and then you have to scroll all the way up to find the Submit button. Beg your pardon? The forms were so long and complex that I got session timeout twice before I finished entering the data and submitted the form. Of course I lost all the stuff I entered.

      Sure, part of the problem was that it's a complex tool for complex situations and big number of users and issues. Which to some extend has to cause the UI to be more complex than one of some simpler and less feature-full tool, but IMHO at least in that version they did a very bad job designing the UI.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://504276]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (2)
As of 2017-06-28 00:46 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?

    Results (619 votes). Check out past polls.