Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re: Request for Comments on Perl::Critic

by cchampion (Curate)
on Nov 01, 2005 at 10:36 UTC ( #504561=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Request for Comments on Perl::Critic

I used Perl::Critic 0.12 to clean some legacy code and I was impressed. Now I see that the latest version has many enhancements, and such a task should be much easier.

I like the interface, although the policy names are a little scary. If you could find a way of making them shorter (or even identifiable by some acronym, for instance ppwb as a shortcut to ProhibitParensWithBuiltins) perhaps they could become a habit for command line enthusiasts.

As for your plan to enhancements, I see very favourably your idea of covering most of Conway's book, but I don't think I would use a feature that changes my code automatically based on some rule. Sure it looks interesting, but I produce just enough bugs manually, that I don't need the ones introduced in my code automatically.


Kudos for this great job!

Comment on Re: Request for Comments on Perl::Critic

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://504561]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-28 09:21 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (740 votes), past polls