Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Consider this: What makes a good node title?

by sauoq (Abbot)
on Nov 04, 2005 at 19:01 UTC ( #505843=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Consider this: What makes a good node title?
in thread Consider this: What makes a good node title?

That's exactly why we can vote on considerations: if enough people vote to "keep" the original title, it doesn't need to be changed.

True. And really, those are exactly the people whom I am addressing with this post. Many considerations are voted on without... well... without a whole lot of consideration. In the end, I'm just trying to raise consciousness about it. I think that, the more thought people put into it, the less enthusiastic they will be about retitling. And, I believe that's a good thing (after having put in quite a bit of thought on the subject myself.)

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";


Comment on Re^4: Consider this: What makes a good node title?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://505843]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-07-05 21:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls