|Syntactic Confectionery Delight|
Re^2: People who write perl, Perl and PERLby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Nov 22, 2005 at 08:56 UTC||Need Help??|
Let me say up front that I am not accusing you of anything, nor do I have any reasons to believe that you would subscribe to anything that follows in any way whatsoever.
Isn't it a slippery slope from what you are saying above to
Or any number of other, many more obvious, pre-judgement criteria?
All of which would be equally, ethically dubious. Some of which are, in most countries, outright illegal.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.