Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

by jbrugger (Parson)

on Jan 30, 2006 at 06:57 UTC ( [id://526393]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

Ok. Got your message :)

"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.

Comment on Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Double voting (to get better answers as well?) by davido (Cardinal) on Jan 30, 2006 at 07:33 UTC
No harm, no foul. ;) Thanks though! By the way, I do think your arguments for double-votes on nodes are reasonable. There have been plenty of times where I've wished that I could give two plus votes to a node that I really liked. But ultimately I still disagree that it's necessary. lol. It makes for interesting discussion though, so ++,++ to your original post. ;) Dave	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://526393]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others chilling in the Monastery: (4)

As of 2024-04-20 09:27 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found