Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

by jbrugger (Parson)
on Jan 30, 2006 at 07:31 UTC ( #526395=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)
in thread Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

I don't understand you here.
I would not go to another supersearch, but just click on your name, then on your 'writeups', but that's not what i ment.
'writeups' is the Perl Monks User Search that ambrus suggests. (thanks ysth).

I'd like to create a way of 'rewarding' monks so they feel like giving more effort in creating better nodes/answers than those that are not.
Indeed, davido gave a good reason why not, GrandFather gave a good reason why we should.
I don't want to create a 'vote shower', but the thing is, the Voting/Experience System works, even though it should be a non issue, everyone likes his nodes (and then ego) to be ++ed.
I won't -- you here, but i'd never do it this way....
I'm lying now, i gave one person all my possible ++ votes because of a joke / chat in the chatterbox one day...

"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.


Comment on Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://526395]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-29 07:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls