Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

by jbrugger (Parson)
on Jan 30, 2006 at 07:31 UTC ( #526395=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)
in thread Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

I don't understand you here.
I would not go to another supersearch, but just click on your name, then on your 'writeups', but that's not what i ment.
'writeups' is the Perl Monks User Search that ambrus suggests. (thanks ysth).

I'd like to create a way of 'rewarding' monks so they feel like giving more effort in creating better nodes/answers than those that are not.
Indeed, davido gave a good reason why not, GrandFather gave a good reason why we should.
I don't want to create a 'vote shower', but the thing is, the Voting/Experience System works, even though it should be a non issue, everyone likes his nodes (and then ego) to be ++ed.
I won't -- you here, but i'd never do it this way....
I'm lying now, i gave one person all my possible ++ votes because of a joke / chat in the chatterbox one day...

"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.


Comment on Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://526395]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-21 23:59 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (109 votes), past polls