Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Why Perl is a Valid Choice

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Feb 02, 2006 at 09:38 UTC ( #527274=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Why Perl is a Valid Choice
in thread Why Perl is a Valid Choice

I've worked at a job where the problem was the exact opposite of these two statements -- the directory of the department had been a consultant -- he believed that the solution to any problem was to throw bigger hardware at the problem, and that the tech folks were just an annoyance that he had to deal with.

I've had similar experience.

Some of the very best managers I've worked with have been completely non-technical. Some of the very worst managers I've worked with have been ex-techies.

In my experience the divide between good and bad management has very little to do with technical experience, and a lot to do with being able to trust people to do their job well and remove the things that stop them doing it.


Comment on Re^3: Why Perl is a Valid Choice
Re^4: Why Perl is a Valid Choice
by tirwhan (Abbot) on Feb 02, 2006 at 10:13 UTC

    Ditto, oh so ditto!

    The one singular criteria which for me divides a good manager from a bad one is that the good manager will readily accept criticism from his "subordinates" and act on it (in a way that does not automatically involve firing the critic ;-). There are lots of others, but throughout my career this one has always been true. Unfortunately, the ratio of bad to good is atrocious amongst managers (probably worse than with any other job), because

    • Managers are held in higher regard than other employees, thus people who are primarily motivated by status considerations tend to aspire to management careers
    • There are few good performance metrics for managers
    • People who underperform at their productive jobs are often pushed into management as a way to get rid of them
    • Managers are often under the delusion that they need to "lead" people when they should actually be communicating with and facilitating communication between them
    • People who do well at their productive jobs but are terrible management material (because they don't communicate well for example) are pushed into management as a promotion. I think this one is probably the worst, whoever came up with the notion that a move to management was a promotion did us all a great disservice.

    And for the record, I personally know I'm terrible management material (I believe I'm better than most I've worked under, but still terrible). I'm well aware that management is a tough job and requires several uncommon skills. I just wish the emphasis on employing managers was more on quality than quantity.


    There are ten types of people: those that understand binary and those that don't.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://527274]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-09-19 23:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (151 votes), past polls