Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Testing regex equivalence

by blokhead (Monsignor)
on Feb 21, 2006 at 17:25 UTC ( #531742=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Testing regex equivalence

See also this thread.

The short answer is that you can do this by converting regular expressions to NFAs/DFAs (for more details, see my reply in the thread I referenced). However, this cannot be done in a super-efficient way. In fact, the problem of deciding equivalence of two regular expressions is PSPACE-complete (which is bad ;)). Even in your special case of deciding whether a regular expression accepts all strings, the problem remains PSPACE-complete (google for regular expression universality).

Being PSPACE-complete does not mean it's impossible. It's quite possible, but will quickly become very impractical for large regular expressions..

As for how to do the conversion to NFA/DFA, I can tell you that another monk and I are working on a formal language & automata toolkit that will make this easy, but it won't be ready for a while...

Update: as for your idea above to "simplify" a regex, that is essentially the same thing and will not gain you anything. Testing regex equivalency reduces to the problem of finding the "simplest" equivalent regex (no matter how you define "simplest"), so regex simplification is still a PSPACE-hard problem (-hard instead of -complete because we're now talking about a search procedure, not a decision procedure).

blokhead


Comment on Re: Testing regex equivalence

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://531742]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-27 22:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (253 votes), past polls