Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: This could have DWIM better

by ysth (Canon)
on Mar 02, 2006 at 09:32 UTC ( #533833=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: This could have DWIM better
in thread This could have DWIM better

Yikes, that's a bug(update: shows a bug in perl itself). The call to length should explicitly be passing $_, but it's not (update: passes nothing) when it is overridden. This causes a problem with lexical $_:

$ perl5.9.4 -w BEGIN{ *CORE::GLOBAL::length = sub (;$) { my $arg = @_ ? $_[0] : $_; defined($arg) ? CORE::length($arg) : undef; } } $_ = "abc"; my $_; $_ = "defghi"; print length; __END__ 3
This should print 6 whether length is overridden or not, but as is prints 3 when it is overridden.

Update: after consideration, I think this is just a natural consequence of the ;$ prototype, and should be no longer a problem with a _ prototype (when someone implements that).


Comment on Re^2: This could have DWIM better
Download Code
Re^3: This could have DWIM better
by japhy (Canon) on Mar 02, 2006 at 14:52 UTC
    Sounds like it's passing the package/global $_ instead of the lexical $_. I must've missed the memo on "lexical $_".

    Jeff japhy Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and perl hacker
    How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart
      It's passing nothing. The bug is that the code calling length should always provide the argument.

      The memo.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://533833]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-08-29 12:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (280 votes), past polls