Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Bob
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: This could have DWIM better

by japhy (Canon)
on Mar 02, 2006 at 14:52 UTC ( #533903=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: This could have DWIM better
in thread This could have DWIM better

Sounds like it's passing the package/global $_ instead of the lexical $_. I must've missed the memo on "lexical $_".


Jeff japhy Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and perl hacker
How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart


Comment on Re^3: This could have DWIM better
Re^4: This could have DWIM better
by ysth (Canon) on Mar 02, 2006 at 18:51 UTC
    It's passing nothing. The bug is that the code calling length should always provide the argument.

    The memo.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://533903]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-04-24 09:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (565 votes), past polls