Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

Re^3: This could have DWIM better

by japhy (Canon)
on Mar 02, 2006 at 14:52 UTC ( #533903=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: This could have DWIM better
in thread This could have DWIM better

Sounds like it's passing the package/global $_ instead of the lexical $_. I must've missed the memo on "lexical $_".

Jeff japhy Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and perl hacker
How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: This could have DWIM better
by ysth (Canon) on Mar 02, 2006 at 18:51 UTC
    It's passing nothing. The bug is that the code calling length should always provide the argument.

    The memo.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://533903]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (4)
As of 2016-10-22 17:25 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (297 votes). Check out past polls.