Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: PMC (Perl Module Compiled) survey

by Juerd (Abbot)
on Mar 12, 2006 at 20:27 UTC ( #536133=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: PMC (Perl Module Compiled) survey
in thread PMC (Perl Module Compiled) survey

Given what .pmc is for, I'd say reporting it on the .pm is correct. If you're abusing the mechanism, you get abusive error messages in return.

Even in original intent of .pmc, both in the .pm and in the .pmc, (different) things can go wrong. And they should be reported from the right file. Especially reporting an error in a file that doesn't exist is a bit silly.

For example, with the original Bytecode/Byteloader stuff, the PMC loads Byteloader with a version check. If that version check fails, the error is reported from the PM, which has nothing to do with the error. That makes debugging hard. Hiding the fact that there's another file involved, is bad.

Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }


Comment on Re^3: PMC (Perl Module Compiled) survey

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://536133]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-07-26 14:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (178 votes), past polls