Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping

by SamCG (Hermit)
on Apr 10, 2006 at 17:49 UTC ( #542336=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping



My best job was eventually ruined by various circumstances. The company, however, was excellent.

  • Free lunches
  • Free drinks
  • Profit-sharing plan
  • Bonuses twice yearly
  • Relatively flat hierarchy; within Compliance limits you could talk to anyone in the company
  • up-to-date hardware
  • Health care paid by company, not employee
  • Excellent parties


The company was employee-owned, which may have had something to do with it. People were not fired frequently, and left very infrequently.

My second-best job wasn't in IT. It was at a movie theater. It offered:
  • Free movies
  • Free popcorn
  • Young ladies who were very open and affectionate and wore short skirts
  • leading to excellent parties


This leads me to believe it's either the free food, or the parties, that make or break a workplace. However, "get the right people" has a strong ring of authenticity.


-----------------
s''limp';@p=split '!','n!h!p!';s,m,s,;$s=y;$c=slice @p1;so brutally;d;$n=reverse;$c=$s**$#p;print(''.$c^chop($n))while($c/=$#p)>=1;
  • Comment on Re: On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: On Finding, Hiring, Inspiring and Keeping
by apotheon (Deacon) on Apr 11, 2006 at 23:34 UTC

    That is an excellent comparison! Kudos! It really points out some of the finer details of why the first example was a good one. In general, it's more important to know why some strategies work than to have a laundry-list of previously successful strategies. Don't ask yourself what workplace characteristics are conducive to good workers: ask yourself why those characteristics work. The details can change, but the underlying reasons those details were good at one time remain the same. While you didn't specifically point out the underlying reasons per se, you certainly pointed out that the underlying reasons aren't dependent upon the form they take.

    print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
    - apotheon
    CopyWrite Chad Perrin

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://542336]
help
Chatterbox?
[erix]: you seem forget there is another idiot coming :)
[Your Mother]: The US government does not attract talent, but grafters and liars and it has been that way for the better part of a century. FEW exceptions.
[erix]: you think it only /looks/ worse this time?
[Your Mother]: HR Clinton was literally threatening Russia. She would have been MUCH more likely to start real trouble.
[Your Mother]: I think there is less decorum this time.
[Your Mother]: We’ve had rapists and thieves and unqualified government. They just had decorum.
[erix]: heh, understatement of the week :)
[erix]: well, I hope you're right
[Your Mother]: Bill Clinton assaulted and raped repeatedly. Even when it was hinted and finally all but proved, no one cared because his sexism, and racism, and killing was decorous.
[Your Mother]: I think Trump might be better specifically because no one respects him so he won't get his way the way the others did.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-01-20 01:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?




    Results (173 votes). Check out past polls.