|Problems? Is your data what you think it is?|
Re^3: Second rate programmers and my confessionby radiantmatrix (Parson)
|on Jul 05, 2006 at 18:33 UTC||Need Help??|
Concisely put, someone who has a deep knowledge of something gains, as a result, the capacity to appropriately hide its complexity through simple metaphor.
When someone doesn't understand as well, he or she cannot as easily extrapolate a simple metaphor, and can only give a technical answer.
When someone doesn't understand at all, he or she might simply hide behind impressive-sounding words.
This is largely because the knowledgeable individual is much more confident about leaving out technical details, because he or she knows which details are unimportant for a given context. The less-knowledgeable has not not yet developed a feel for which technical details are really important in understanding a given concept.
So, while an explanation filled with technical detail doesn't automatically mean the speaker/author is not knowledgeable, it does tend to work out that way.
A collection of thoughts and links from the minds of geeks
The Code that can be seen is not the true Code
I haven't found a problem yet that can't be solved by a well-placed trebuchet