Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Hashing Memory Usage

by awkmonk (Monk)
on Jul 13, 2006 at 09:00 UTC ( #560893=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Hashing Memory Usage
in thread Hashing Memory Usage

The problem is that the old box is the current production machine. No-one would let me go anywhere near changing that. It's beginning to look like I either need new Perl binaries, which they just might let me load, or I re-write my routine.


'I think the problem lies in the fact that your data doesn't fit my program'.


Comment on Re^2: Hashing Memory Usage
Re^3: Hashing Memory Usage
by shmem (Canon) on Jul 13, 2006 at 10:09 UTC
    Then do it the other way round. Build a 5.6.0 perl on the new box, and test that.

    --shmem

    _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q/)Oo.  G\        /
                                  /\_/(q    /
    ----------------------------  \__(m.====.(_("always off the crowd"))."
    ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}
      I'd love to, but now they're telling me that they are unhappy supporting software that has been 'modified' from the original.

      A big gold star for anyone who has twigged that this is a "government project".

      I wish I could work out who to hit.


      'I think the problem lies in the fact that your data doesn't fit my program'.

Re^3: Hashing Memory Usage
by nothingmuch (Priest) on Jul 13, 2006 at 17:50 UTC
    Compile perl with a prefix, and store it in your home directory, where nobody else can touch it. It should be safe.
    -nuffin
    zz zZ Z Z #!perl

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://560893]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (19)
As of 2014-07-28 16:45 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (204 votes), past polls