Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

by planetscape (Chancellor)
on Oct 07, 2006 at 04:38 UTC ( #576795=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
in thread How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

Technically, one cannot approve or front-page one's own nodes. However, if one is working in concert with another, it's obviously possible to see how one account can approve, front-page, upvote another, etc. Approval can be withdrawn by janitors, though, and anyone who suspects behaviour as outlined above is advised to give the gods and/or janitors a heads-up. (janitors as a user-group can be messaged the same way you'd message another Monk.)


Comment on Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
by grep (Monsignor) on Oct 07, 2006 at 06:03 UTC
    Well here's at least one example of one approving the other's plagiarism.

    One dead unjugged rabbit fish later

      There are many actually. Also interesting is the preponderance of root nodes madtoperl posted. Most monks who have been around for a while have contributed many more replies than they have root nodes.

      DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://576795]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-11-27 23:24 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (734 votes), past polls