Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is there a Java testing framework that output's TAP?

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Nov 22, 2006 at 09:07 UTC ( #585468=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is there a Java testing framework that output's TAP?

I'm wondering if there are any Java testing tools already in existence that output their results in TAP format so that thier testing output can be incorportated into our Test::Builder-based testing framework.

Not that I'm aware of. Shouldn't be to hard to subclass org.junit.runner.Runner, or iterate over a org.junit.runner.Result though.


Comment on Re: Is there a Java testing framework that output's TAP?
Re^2: Is there a Java testing framework that output's TAP?
by jordanh (Chaplain) on Nov 22, 2006 at 15:30 UTC
    Just a quick comment/observation. If someone did implement a TAP-compatible testing framework for Java, would it be appropriate for inclusion in CPAN?

    Discuss amoung yourselves.

      It should probably be mentioned in the TAP pod, but I don't think it should be hosted on CPAN. This would make it consistant with libtap (a C tap parser), at least.
Re^2: Is there a Java testing framework that output's TAP?
by DrWhy (Chaplain) on Nov 22, 2006 at 23:31 UTC
    Thanks for the suggestion. I may take this approach. It'll be a good project for me to get my feet wet in Java -- not that this is my language of choice mind you, but since that's what I'm being given, I'll have to adapt.

    --DrWhy

    "If God had meant for us to think for ourselves he would have given us brains. Oh, wait..."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://585468]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-23 18:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (149 votes), past polls