Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Bob
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Downvoting Aging

by boo_radley (Parson)
on Feb 15, 2001 at 20:25 UTC ( #58633=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Downvoting Aging

Maybe we could also have automatic ++ing of nodes after a certain time. Now that we have the surcease of painful nodes, most nodes that would be --'ed are just getting considered and eaten. So, we can assume that, because a node exists for (a week| a month| a year) it is still quality and worth of ++ing.

Seriously though, I don't understand why people neurose over the idea of being --'ed. I don't think that (most) people will maliciously -- old posts as a vendetta, and if they do, so what? I'd rather have someone -- an old post because it's an old worthless post rather than taking that ability away from them.


Comment on Re: Downvoting Aging
Re^2: Downvoting Aging
by tadman (Prior) on Feb 16, 2001 at 01:04 UTC
    I'd have to agree. Stupid and useless posts are stupid and useless posts regardless of age. -- them as you see fit. There's no point in SuperSearch digging up useless posts with no content or purpose.

    It would seem, though, that NodeReaper will take the dead and the mortally wounded unto salvation, such that their misery is ended and they can be downvoted no longer. Isn't that good enough?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://58633]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-04-20 11:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (485 votes), past polls