Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Diffusing Knowledge and Fortune to the Less Wise and Less Fortunate Monks.

by bladx (Chaplain)
on Feb 21, 2001 at 20:28 UTC ( #59956=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Diffusing Knowledge and Fortune to the Less Wise and Less Fortunate Monks.

You've probably read this type of reply enough...but this is a super idea deprecated! I'm a new programmer to Perl myself... and only being 16 I really don't have any sufficient funds to pay for ANY Perl books other than like checking books out in the public library and so on.

If you really did start a charity fund for Perl programming books like you said in your idea... that'd be cool for people less fortunate like me and dusk and many others out there that would benefit from it too!

The only question I would have about this would be like stated earlier too: how would you determine where the money was gathered at...(where people would donate too...) and also how you would determine how people could get a free Perl programming bool.

Thanks for listening...

----------------------------------
bladx ~ heh heh heh...


Comment on Re: Diffusing Knowledge and Fortune to the Less Wise and Less Fortunate Monks.
Re: Re: Diffusing Knowledge and Fortune to the Less Wise and Less Fortunate Monks.
by Stamp_Guy (Monk) on Feb 22, 2001 at 05:12 UTC
    Make that two of us. As mentioned above, the time limit at the library is a BIG problem. My local library has a couple books, but it takes a lot of time to absorb all that info in those books, especially when you're still in high-school!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://59956]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-30 07:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (229 votes), past polls