Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^5: The Germanic language form

by jdporter (Canon)
on Jun 02, 2007 at 13:47 UTC ( #618908=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: The Germanic language form
in thread The Germanic language form

The split infinitive: They could be more formally written as...

That's not a split infinitive, because it's not an infinitive at all. The word rearrangement you suggest has null effect, except perhaps for questions of style.

The thing I don't like about "They could be more formally written as..." is that it's in the passive voice. This could be eliminated by rewording as "One could write them more formally as..." But, of course, there are contexts in which passive voice is not only acceptable but preferable, for example, in scientific writing. Is this discourse scientific enough to merit passive voice? I don't know, but I personally would err on the other side.

A word spoken in Mind will reach its own level, in the objective world, by its own weight

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://618908]
and the voices are still...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-03-20 23:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (262 votes). Check out past polls.