I assume you didn't expect me to actually look... but I did.
I used SOAP version 0.28, emacs 21.4.1 with it's current version of cperl-mode.
I looked at
- SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Apache
- SOAP::Transport::HTTP::CGI
- SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Client
- SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Server
I saw no mistakes in syntax highlighting. So unless you have a specific complaint, I would suggest checking out your assertion before you post. I'll be quite happy to post screen shots if needed.
|
Re^6: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion
by erroneousBollock (Curate) on Aug 13, 2007 at 05:04 UTC
|
I just scrolled through the whole file.
I have almost the same versions.
I see breakage that seems to be caused by mis-parses of string termination... not vim-bad... but still broken ;)
Could you post that screenshot somewhere so that I may compare it?
Update:
Is it possible that I've mis-configured something and it's falling back to perl-mode ?
I'll be the first to admit I'm not an emacs expert. Only really been using it for 3 months (to play with lisp and slime).
I'm much more comfortable in vim (even with its really weak syntax-highlighting). I've been using it for 10+ years so it's just what I'm used to i guess. My fingers are still not used to hitting the control/alt-keys so much.
Update 2:
Nevermind. It seems my lisp skills are quite sub-par :(
Latest ntemacs and latest cperl-mode (+ actually following instructions) seems quite fine.
Thanks grep, for making me check my facts!
-David.
| [reply] |
