Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Sep 07, 2007 at 15:58 UTC ( #637690=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?
in thread How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?

Aye that's where the ugly bits and pieces of company and office politics rear their monstrous heads.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

  • Comment on Re^3: How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://637690]
help
Chatterbox?
[hippo]: Yary: There are a few useful pointers in I need perl coding standards
[hippo]: ... and a boatload of good stuff in On Coding Standards and Code Reviews
[Yary]: Looking at system pm's, looks like it's "package" on the first line, then POD, then "use 5.xyz;use strict; use warnings; use modules..."
[Yary]: ah thanks for those links
[hippo]: Just bear in mind that all such ideas are subjective.
[choroba]: There might be a different standard at the shop you write the code for.
[choroba]: The order of package - (strict+warnings | warnings+strict) - modules makes sense, POD and strict-warnings order are not so important

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (12)
As of 2018-01-23 17:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?