"be consistent" PerlMonks

### Re: Recurring Cycle of Fractions

by Sidhekin (Priest)
 on Sep 09, 2007 at 01:34 UTC ( #637884=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Recurring Cycle of Fractions

Actually, every rational number has a recurring cycle in a positional representation ... it's just that for some numbers it is a trivial "0" cycle. But that's just a quibble.

Assuming that the provided string is long enough for two cycles to appear gets boring pretty quickly ... on my system that assumption fails already for 1/17, unless I use bignum. So I'll do that. And, true to habit, I'll use a regex to solve the problem. :)

(Pass an argument to the program to get the cycle for the inverse of more (or less) than the default 99 first natural numbers:)

```#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;
use warnings;

use constant COUNT  => \$ARGV[0]||99;
use constant LENGTH => length COUNT;

use bignum a => 3*COUNT; # accuracy ...

for my \$n (1..COUNT) {
my \$f = substr(1/\$n, 0, 3*COUNT); # precision too ...
if ( \$f =~ /(\d+?)\1+(?!\d{\${\COUNT}})/ ) { # a little leeway ...
printf " 1/%-*d = %-30.30s -> %s\n", LENGTH, \$n, \$f, \$1;
}
else {
# should never happen ...
die "Insufficient precision/accuracy?  Cannot handle the following
+:\n\$f\n";
}
}

Thank you — that was an interesting distraction. :)

Update: Made the leeway big enough that we get the cycle sequence as it first appears, and not some arbitrary cycling of it, no matter how long the sequence.

print "Just another Perl \${\(trickster and hacker)},"
The Sidhekin proves Sidhe did it!

Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://637884]
help
Chatterbox?
 LanX questions the integerity of this approach. .. LanX doesn't sound natural [LanX]: welcome to a new episode of Big Perl Theory...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-03-20 10:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
When I think of a mole I think of:

Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?