Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...) (js)

by tye (Cardinal)
on Sep 14, 2007 at 06:36 UTC ( #638958=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...) (js)
in thread Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...)

Does that imply that Javascript has different capture semantics than perl?

No. It is just that match() returns the matched substrings, not the captured substrings. If //g in a list context could be told to return the matched substrings (what it does when there are no capturing parens), then the same solution would work in Perl.

A better JavaScript solution is actually: "ZBBBCZZ".match(/(.)\1*/g). No need for the second set of parens.

- tye        


Comment on Re^5: Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...) (js)
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Yet Another Rosetta Code Problem (Perl, Ruby, Python, Haskell, ...) (??{})
by pKai (Priest) on Sep 22, 2007 at 10:54 UTC

    Telling m//g in list context to forget about the captures and just return the matches:

    @list = "ZBBCZZ" =~ /(??{'(.)\1*'})/g;

    or probably more exact: there are no captures m// can see

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://638958]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-08 04:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (94 votes), past polls