Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The need and the price of running on old versions of Perl

by autarch (Hermit)
on Sep 21, 2007 at 02:20 UTC ( #640253=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The need and the price of running on old versions of Perl

My personal stance has usually been something like "I'll support two major versions most of the time, and three for a little while after a new release".

I do reserve the right to not support particularly old point releases of those major versions, however. In particular, Perl 5.6.0 had so many critical bugs that working around them was just impossible. I test with Perl 5.6.2, and I'd take patches for 5.6.1, but if you're still on 5.6.0 too bad for you.

Similarly, if you're using a particularly ancient 5.8 (say 5.8.0 or 5.8.1) and one of my modules triggers a known Unicode bug in those versions, too bad, since one of the main reason to upgrade to a more modern 5.8 is for Unicode bug fixes.

I expect to stop supporting 5.6 for my modules a year or two after 5.10 comes out, though I won't intentionally break them, I'll probably just stop testing with 5.6 at all.

Overall, I think that's a reasonable balance between using modern features and backwards compatibility. In my personal projects which aren't intended for release, I do tend to use the latest and greatest, even if that code might end up freely available (like the source for VegGuide.Org).


Comment on Re: The need and the price of running on old versions of Perl

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://640253]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-08-01 09:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Who would be the most fun to work for?















    Results (0 votes), past polls