Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

by Aim9b (Monk)
on Oct 25, 2007 at 14:06 UTC ( #647178=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

Speaking as a real noobie, I prefer the answer, the why it works, AND the pointer to the doc/posts/articles/etc. I'll most always try several pieces of code first, & will include it in the question if relevant, but if I'm given ONLY the RTFM answer, I'll find another place to ask.
At this site, that's never been the case. I usually get several of each, & I appreciate it more than you know. At most times, I too learn by reading other posts. It's a fantastic tool, & I'd hate to see it fade away.

Usually, I'm reading 4-5 good answers by the time I even get to trying to answer the question. I use these to 'test' the validity of my own answer. Sometimes, I'm right on, other times, well... but if by some minor miracle, I get to a point where I can answer some other persons post, I'll consider it an honor to be among the knowledgeable people here at the monestary.

So, my vote (?) would be - Do BOTH, & let the recipient decide.

1. You get the issue resolved & possibly gain a long term perl advocate.
2. The ones that don't stay, wouldn't anyway.
3. You probably helped me & folks like me, without even realizing it.

RE: the CB, It scrolls off too fast, & I'd feel I was missing a lot if usable information.


Comment on Re: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://647178]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-03 21:30 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (56 votes), past polls