This is the topic of one of my TPJ columns: Making New Distributions.

I use Template Toolkit. I create a directory of templates that do exactly what I want then process it with ttree. I can make the templates any way that I like without fooling with someone else's idea of what they should be, and my template cooker script can set any variables it likes so I don't have to specify those with the command.

I've made it even easier since I wrote that article. I use it this like:

prompt> module_cooker Foo::Bar
[download]

Here's the code:

#!/usr/bin/perl

use Cwd;
use File::Spec;

my $module = $ARGV[0] || prompt( "Module name> " );
my $dist   = $module; $dist =~ s/::/-/g;
my $file   = $module; $file =~ s/.*:://; $file .= ".pm";

my $cwd    = File::Spec->catfile( cwd(), $dist );

system 
        join " ",
        "/usr/local/bin/ttree"        ,
        "-s ~/.templates/modules"     ,
        "-d $cwd"                     ,
        "-define module='$module'"    ,
        "-define module_file='$file'" ,
        "-define module_dist='$dist'"
        ;

chdir $dist;

( my $base = $module ) =~ s/.*:://;

rename 
        File::Spec->catfile( 'lib', 'Foo.pm' ),
        File::Spec->catfile( 'lib', $file );
        

sub prompt
        {
        print join "\n", @_;
        print "> ";
        
        my $line = <STDIN>;
        chomp $line;
        $line;
        }
[download]

Thank you, this is a lot of good info to digest. I'm still considering how the rest of the template directory would look, as I'm a little rusty on my Template::Toolkit, but in the meantime, the article looks like a good start.

Update - I like the approach, and in the long term I might want to adopt something similar myself, but at this point I don't have that template directory of exactly how I like everything.

I have found it quite useful and a good way to enforce good practice from the beginning.

It's looking like the consensus is Module::Starter for those just starting out (pun intended) but then as you're no longer a beginner at beginning, and have your own specific preferences, the template toolkit approach looks better. Thank you (and all others who suggested Module::Starter)

I've used both Module::Starter and the dragonchild approach of copying and editing an existing module you're happy with ... and been satisfied with both approaches.

For a list of references on creating CPAN modules, see: Re: Finally a first version of my Module! Questions... (I find myself updating this list every time this sort of question gets asked here :-).

Great question. When Andy Lester was in Toronto a few months back, he demoed Module::Starter for me at the pub afterwards, and it was very slick. I haven't used it yet, because I'm still at the point of learning and using Test Driven Development, progressing from Test::More to using prove with Test::Harness. (There's the additional challenge of fiddling with subversion for version control -- requires effort, but definitely worth it.)

I'll continue to learn all of that good stuff, once I've got it well under control, I'll move to Module::Starter, and the stuff that I understand by then will be taken care of for me.

brian's Template Toolkit approach is way nicer as far as building files goes, and it might be a very fruitful idea for someone to try cross-pollinating Module::Starter and Template Toolkit to see if it would make it even easier to customize.

I think for most people either Module::Starter or Module::Starter::PBP will be good enough to get going. If you find there are things that you simply cannot deal with as far as what's assumed as the default, then customizing is easy enough to do that you can at least consider doing it.

I appreciate the bit of info that it's not hard to customize, as well as that Yahoo uses it at least a bit. I'm definintely going to try starting with Module::Starter::PBP and go from there.