Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

by joewong (Initiate)
on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:34 UTC ( #650210=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

Referring to the paragraph "Matching a pattern that doesn't include another pattern", I wonder why ?: is necessary. It seems to be working for me even without ?:. Please explain. thanks.


Comment on Re: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Nov 12, 2007 at 17:54 UTC
    Generally, the decision about using ?: is not about whether it's necessary, but that capturing whatever you're grouping isn't necessary. The ?: modifier makes parentheses not capture, which is somewhat more efficient and might make the task of counting left parentheses less onerous.

    By the way, it's not a lookaround feature.


    Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://650210]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (16)
As of 2015-07-31 13:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (277 votes), past polls