Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

by joewong (Initiate)
on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:34 UTC ( #650210=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

Referring to the paragraph "Matching a pattern that doesn't include another pattern", I wonder why ?: is necessary. It seems to be working for me even without ?:. Please explain. thanks.


Comment on Re: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind
Re^2: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Nov 12, 2007 at 17:54 UTC
    Generally, the decision about using ?: is not about whether it's necessary, but that capturing whatever you're grouping isn't necessary. The ?: modifier makes parentheses not capture, which is somewhat more efficient and might make the task of counting left parentheses less onerous.

    By the way, it's not a lookaround feature.


    Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://650210]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-04-19 06:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (478 votes), past polls