Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Regarding the Chatterbox

by toadi (Chaplain)
on Mar 22, 2001 at 14:40 UTC ( #66290=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Regarding the Chatterbox

Thats why I don't join CB that much. On one hand it's a good thing to talk to peers. But on the other hand some idiots like to harrass.
It's like irc but think irc has better features to do the things you ask. So in my IMHO why not use these existing tool instead of reinventing the wheel???

--
My opinions may have changed,
but not the fact that I am right

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Regarding the Chatterbox
by strredwolf (Chaplain) on Mar 23, 2001 at 04:44 UTC
    IRC's rather feature rich, doesn't have a web interface, and the protocal's much confusing (if parly undocumented).

    PM's Chatterbox is all XML, which kinds self-documents itself.

    --
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.keenspace.com";

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://66290]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: marto also Re^2: Catalyst:: Dispatcher - usage of expand_actions has signature polemic, and yesterday was quoted in CB
[marto]: Discipulus concerned partys should report things. as tye mentioned in his post (linked in the other thread from yesterday) there is an approach and strategy for such things

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-06-23 08:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (538 votes). Check out past polls.