Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Refactoring

by arhuman (Vicar)
on Apr 07, 2001 at 13:37 UTC ( #70701=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Refactoring

That seems to be a great Idea to me.

I like this concept, for it seems practical,
I've seen so many way of programming with a proven/therorical/formal design that were just unusable...

I REALLY like this method (paradigm?) beccause :
  • The idea is simple (iterative 'enhance then check' step).
  • The experience can be saved and transmitted (by describing refactoring recipe.)
  • It seems that the process can be made partially automatic.
  • It can be applyed to EXISITING project AND new ones.

However I'd definitly like to have more info on this (other links, books) and especially opinion of people who have been using it.
A step by step practical example of refactoring using Test, test::Harness on an existing code would be welcome too...

Anyway, thanks for this info, I've never been so excited about a programming method for long... (stephen++ ;-)

"Only Bad Coders Badly Code In Perl" (OBC2IP)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://70701]
help
Chatterbox?
[Eily]: congrats Discipulus :)
[choroba]: I often can't log in to pause. But after it fails for the first time, everything works for the second time.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-02-22 09:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Before electricity was invented, what was the Electric Eel called?






    Results (325 votes). Check out past polls.