Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Refactoring

by arhuman (Vicar)
on Apr 07, 2001 at 13:37 UTC ( #70701=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Refactoring

That seems to be a great Idea to me.

I like this concept, for it seems practical,
I've seen so many way of programming with a proven/therorical/formal design that were just unusable...

I REALLY like this method (paradigm?) beccause :

  • The idea is simple (iterative 'enhance then check' step).
  • The experience can be saved and transmitted (by describing refactoring recipe.)
  • It seems that the process can be made partially automatic.
  • It can be applyed to EXISITING project AND new ones.

However I'd definitly like to have more info on this (other links, books) and especially opinion of people who have been using it.
A step by step practical example of refactoring using Test, test::Harness on an existing code would be welcome too...

Anyway, thanks for this info, I've never been so excited about a programming method for long... (stephen++ ;-)

"Only Bad Coders Badly Code In Perl" (OBC2IP)


Comment on Re: Refactoring

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://70701]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-21 03:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (102 votes), past polls