Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re^5: Practical e-mail address validation (flexes)

by Limbic~Region (Chancellor)
on Sep 13, 2008 at 20:36 UTC ( #711164=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Practical e-mail address validation (flexes)
in thread Practical e-mail address validation

They (email addresses with periods immediately preceding the @) were also very common by Microsoft Exchange back when I was working at the DoJ. I am not sure if M$ has become more compliant. I am going to be updating this node with a variety of other ways at attempting to exploit open relays and I will /msg you when complete.

Update: Rather than enumerate them myself, go to and test an MTA you believe to be secure. It shows you all the email addresses it uses to test with (from and to). I also realized I had the relay syntax wrong. It is I have updated the prior node.

Update: I haven't provided a complete list of "rules" that I think such a theoretical module should include but having "John Smith" is another one that should be flexible. If I come up with more I will add them here but it has been a long time since I thought about such things. Oh, and I used to have to worry about non-SMTP addresses too like CC:Mail and GroupWise (fortunately not UUCP).

Cheers - L~R

Comment on Re^5: Practical e-mail address validation (flexes)
Download Code

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://711164]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-11-30 06:29 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (759 votes), past polls