Re^2: *NEW* CPAN Testers Reports


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks

by barbie (Deacon)

on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:02 UTC ( #712741=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

I've manually added a symlink to fake that fix. Long term fix should be to ask Lincoln to take the -pm out of the distribution name.

Comment on Re^2: NEW CPAN Testers Reports
Re^3: NEW CPAN Testers Reports by Anonymous Monk on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:11 UTC
Long term fix should be to ask Lincoln to take the -pm out of the distribution name. I've got to disagree with you there. Why should the distribution name have any impact upon testers site? It exposes a flaw in your scheme, but it worked before, it should continue working.	[reply]
Re^4: NEW CPAN Testers Reports by barbie (Deacon) on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:40 UTC
Actually it didn't work before (try http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/CGI-pm.html#CGI.pm-3.42). There have been all sorts of problems because CGI.pm has been named differently from all the other distributions. CGI.pm is the exception to the rule everybody else uses :) -- Barbie \| Birmingham Perl Mongers CPAN Testers: Reports \| Wiki \| Statistics	[reply]
Re^5: NEW CPAN Testers Reports by Anonymous Monk on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:59 UTC
before that one it worked :)	[reply]

In Section Perl News

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://712741]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (11)

As of 2013-06-20 01:25 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?