Re^3: *NEW* CPAN Testers Reports


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^3: NEW CPAN Testers Reports

by Anonymous Monk

on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:11 UTC ( #712743=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: *NEW* CPAN Testers Reports
in thread *NEW* CPAN Testers Reports

Long term fix should be to ask Lincoln to take the -pm out of the distribution name.
I've got to disagree with you there. Why should the distribution name have any impact upon testers site? It exposes a flaw in your scheme, but it worked before, it should continue working.

Comment on Re^3: NEW CPAN Testers Reports
Re^4: NEW CPAN Testers Reports by barbie (Deacon) on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:40 UTC
Actually it didn't work before (try http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/CGI-pm.html#CGI.pm-3.42). There have been all sorts of problems because CGI.pm has been named differently from all the other distributions. CGI.pm is the exception to the rule everybody else uses :) -- Barbie \| Birmingham Perl Mongers CPAN Testers: Reports \| Wiki \| Statistics	[reply]
Re^5: NEW CPAN Testers Reports by Anonymous Monk on Sep 20, 2008 at 16:59 UTC
before that one it worked :)	[reply]

In Section Perl News

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://712743]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others lurking in the Monastery: (20)

As of 2013-05-21 15:17 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

The best material for plates (tableware) is:

Results (438 votes), past polls