Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re^5: Burned by precedence rules

by ikegami (Pope)
on Dec 30, 2008 at 19:08 UTC ( #733320=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Burned by precedence rules
in thread Burned by precedence rules

I make a whole lot of "wholly artificial distinctions". Most people call them "programming styles". Programing styles can be every shade of good and bad, but just pointing out it's a programming style isn't an argument.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Burned by precedence rules
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Dec 30, 2008 at 22:03 UTC

      I'm just wondering what's wrong with artificial distinctions. So much that it needs to be mentioned and highlighted.

        So much that it needs to be mentioned and highlighted.

        You mean, apart from the fact that I chose to emphasise it in support of my premise?

        As for "what's wrong with artificial distinctions." Everything or nothing.

        For the everything, consider the history of artificial distinctions. People of type XYZ are less human. People of religion XYZ are less...

        Artificial is defined as: Man-made; of artifice; False, misleading; Unnatural. In this context, I'd simplify that as 'illogical'.

        As long as you are making the distinction for your own purposes, there's nothing wrong. Just as when I chose not to make that distinction, there is nothing wrong.

        Now re-read my post that you are trying so hard to pick an argument about. It simply says that if you (in the generic sense, not the you personally sense), elect to not make the artificial distinction, then you may find uses and usefulness in the low priority boolean operators, that outweights the need to exercise a little care in their use.

        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://733320]
[perldigious]: Hmm, thanks Lotus1... perldigious scribbles note to buy lots of opossums as "pets" in the future to hang around outside his property. :-P
[1nickt]: You must twist and pull! If you burn, use tea tree oil etc, the tick barfs (inside your blood vessel) and you get all the loevely bacteria in his gut transferred to yours.
[1nickt]: tweesers work just fine
[hippo]: Hope everyone else is enjoying their lunch too.
[1nickt]: However, note that it takes between 2 and 4 hours for a tick to be able to start transmitting bacteria. So even if it has burrowed in and started eating, if you get it soon you should be OK.
[perldigious]: 1nickt: No more red meat! It would be more humane to just kill you, wouldn't it! :-)
[1nickt]: Just don't make it barf.
[1nickt]: perldigious that's exactly what my stepson says.
[1nickt]: the tick that can make you a vegetarian
[perldigious]: Your Mother: Yeah, I have a tool for ticks that I use (mostly on my dogs thankfully), but it's just a cheapo one I got from my vets office... it works pretty good though.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-05-24 13:08 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?