Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?

by grinder (Bishop)
on May 06, 2009 at 15:02 UTC ( #762296=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?
in thread Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?

I don't think the topic has drifted.

The point I wanted to make was that a ternary conditional is a viable alternative to introducing a scope (a 3-line if), if statement modifiers are not favoured by local shop practices. (Which is a reasonable edict, even if I don't agree with it myself).

I'm not sure where you saw the explicit undef?

There was none. It came about in my snippet from employing a ternary, which requires one to put something "in the else" part.

• another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl

  • Comment on Re^5: Does eval cause that much of a performance hit?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://762296]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (10)
As of 2016-12-05 13:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (82 votes). Check out past polls.