Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Regex bug in 5.10 (was: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind)

by jds17 (Pilgrim)
on May 08, 2009 at 19:47 UTC ( #762920=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Regex bug in 5.10 (was: Using Look-ahead and Look-behind)
in thread Using Look-ahead and Look-behind

You are right, my change did not affect greediness. The bad thing is: now I don't understand why my proposed solution worked at all. Maybe someone can explain? I don't think the question is too important, but I like to use regular expressions and it bugs me a little if I cannot understand one (especially such a tiny one).

I have read the documentation you have cited and it helped, so I played around some more and tried out the following, which only exchanges "+" for "*" in your original expression, really works as one would think and therefore would be my preferred solution, at least for Perl 5.10:

$_ = "Hello"; print "$1\n" while /(?=(.+))/g;
Output:
Hello ello llo lo o

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://762920]
help
Chatterbox?
[stevieb]: valgrind doesn't catch a deep internal segfault issue :( sigh
[james28909]: yep, i am scraping a websites date/time stamp from an article. none of that is relevant though because the strings i get are as expected. the returned data from the website is the list of @weekdays
[james28909]: i need to convert those @weekdays to an numerical date based off of scalar localtime

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (2)
As of 2017-04-29 03:45 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (531 votes). Check out past polls.