Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?

by dws (Chancellor)
on May 04, 2001 at 01:47 UTC ( #77806=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?
in thread variables not posting?

It's intended to be supported in the future, so if you don't start supporting it now, browsers which use it in the future will break your code.

Do I detect the faint scent of some large corporation sneaking this into some specification to guarantee the future obsolescence of everyone else's software? :-(

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: (Ovid - hand-rolled CGI review) Re: variables not posting?
by turnstep (Parson) on May 04, 2001 at 19:14 UTC

    No, it's just that the ampersand was a bad choice to use, but the original designers of cgi were doing the best they could. :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://77806]
help
Chatterbox?
[Lady_Aleena]: Module is currently 104 lines but will shirnk to 63. The script using the module is currently 40 lines but will grow to 82, 180 to 146 lines total. (This is after rewrting the data files.)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-05-29 03:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?