Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof

by Jeffrey Kegler (Friar)
on Aug 15, 2009 at 01:53 UTC ( #788801=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof
in thread Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof

In a series of three articles in The Perl Review, now available online, I laid this proof out much more carefully, in three different versions. The most bullet-proof version derives the result directly from Rice's Theorem.

You are right that the proof would not go through if the only way of establishing a prototype for a Perl function was via a function definition. As I said in Perl Review (4.3, p. 28):

I must show that I can use Turing-complete Perl code to determine the prototype of the dunno subroutine at compile time. A function definition won’t work.

Summarizing from that article, there are at least two ways that the prototype of a subroutine can be established using Turing-complete Perl code. One is with symbol table manipulation, for example:

BEGIN { *dunno = sub () { 3 } }
A second way is to put the function definition into a string which is eval'd in a BEGIN block. I believe clever monks will be able to think of others.


Comment on Re^2: Perl Cannot Be Parsed: A Formal Proof
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://788801]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-04-21 02:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (489 votes), past polls