The wikibook stands to give /everyone/ with a browser a source of third party docs that don't fall under your jurisdiction and that can be changed or updated without "special access" or doc patch known-how
You make this sound like an act of rebellion against us as your oppressors, a little dramatic don't you think? And honestly, the whole "under your jurisdiction" comment and the censorship it implies is ridiculous.
You were have been banned from #moose for repeatedly being a troll and causing trouble. I personally stuck my neck out for you several times and got you unbanned but you just went right back to the same behavior that got you banned initially. Your exclusion from the community is self-inflicted, you simply pissed off the wrong people (the ones with ops).
As for access to the docs, we have Moose mirrored on github and happily accept branches from anyone as long as they are accurate and correct. Yes you need to know git in order to contribute, but this is how open source works often times. And if you really can't/don't want to go through git, we would happily accept old-school patches or even just simple corrections via the mailing list/IRC/RT.cpan (it might take longer for people to get around to applying them though).
There is no real barrier to contribution here, only one you have erected yourself through your continued troll-ish behavior.
I would still assert that it has strong assets, and that I still update it every now and then. I really like the great concentrated doc for has(),
This may very well be true, but it would be so much nicer if you would contribute to the official docs instead so that we can have one central place for this information. But alas, if you feel the need to be a martyr, go for it.
| 