Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Nobody Expects the Agile Imposition (Part II): The Office

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Feb 14, 2010 at 13:40 UTC ( #823120=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Nobody Expects the Agile Imposition (Part II): The Office

I think that all 'new' methodologies only work for those who haven't already established their own methodology.

If you impose an always drive on the left (or right) rule, where there was previously no such rule, you'll see a considerable improvement in traffic flow. But take away an experienced carpenter's Yankee screwdriver, and force him to use an electric one and his productivity will fall sharply.

The problem with new methodologies is that they become self-serving. Someone strings together half a dozen simple--and often common sense--ideas that work for them and their group and utilise it successfully on one or two projects. Inevitably, someone (usually someone else) sees the possibility to make money from them.

So they take those half-dozen ideas and formalise them. In the process they throw in a few buzz words de jour, some self-evident good practices wrapped over in marketing speak, and generally baulk up the whole thing with a few tortured analogies. They then set about the task of selling you (or more likely, your boss), on their "solution", with nary a care for whether it actually solves your problems.

A couple of questions to ask yourself (or your boss) when considering any new methodology:

  • Does the seller have anything to lose if your project fails? Or fails to gain from its introduction?
  • If you take the products main "How to..." or "Guidelines..." or "Instruction manual" document, and remove all the hyperbole; excessive adjectives, adverbs and superlatives; marketing speak; cutesy and/or tortured analogies; similes and metaphors; unverifiable statistics, bar charts and graphs; and customer testimonials.

    Ie. Reduce it to plain language that simply tells you what they are suggesting you do at each step.

    Does what's left a) still make sense; b) constitute anything more than just common practice and common sense?

  • If you are considering imposing this methodology upon an existing team, does it advocate or require that team to discard all their existing, hard won, proven practices?

Snake-oil salesmen have been around for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. The products and pitches may change, but the underlying scam hasn't. It still relies upon taking something of low real cost (and usually little real value), and pitching it as the Golden Hammer, Silver bullet or Zauberkugel for a wide-spread, intractable and costly problem.

And there is still one born every minute!


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.


Comment on Re: Nobody Expects the Agile Imposition (Part II): The Office

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://823120]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-23 22:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (154 votes), past polls