Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?

Re^3: cross scope gotos?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Apr 06, 2010 at 16:04 UTC ( #833062=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: cross scope gotos?
in thread cross scope gotos?

You can't jump to a label out of the current or previous frames!

I think that's (currently) an over statement:

perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ while(1){ loop: print 'hi' } }"

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^3: cross scope gotos?
Download Code
Re^4: cross scope gotos?
by LanX (Canon) on Apr 06, 2010 at 16:09 UTC
    > I think that's (currently) an over statement:

    nope, while has a proper block but not a proper "frame" like foreach or subs.

    (I read somewhere that foreach has internally a frame, but no time to search now...)

    But the confusion is understandable, that's why I started the thread.

    Cheers Rolf


      perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ for(;;){ loop: print 'hi' } }"

      Update: Ah, you did say foreach

      >perl -le"goto loop; $x=0; if( $x ){ for(1){ loop: print 'hi' } }" Can't "goto" into the middle of a foreach loop at -e line 1.

      Mind you, it's not really related to stack frames. Any required frame is created by goto. Since it's an explicit check for OP_ENTERITER, it appears more of a question of there not being any sensible way of initialising the iterator of the iterated loop into which you are jumping.

      /* push wanted frames */ if (*enterops && enterops[1]) { OP * const oldop = PL_op; ix = enterops[1]->op_type == OP_ENTER && in_block ? 2 : 1; for (; enterops[ix]; ix++) { PL_op = enterops[ix]; /* Eventually we may want to stack the needed arguments * for each op. For now, we punt on the hard ones. */ if (PL_op->op_type == OP_ENTERITER) DIE(aTHX_ "Can't \"goto\" into the middle of a foreach loo +p"); CALL_FPTR(PL_op->op_ppaddr)(aTHX); } PL_op = oldop; }

      Update: Improved phrasing of last paragraph and added supporting code.

        Well I don't know anymore where I read the word "frame" in connection with foreach-loops.

        The glossary of the docs is often far too fuzzy to justify a long discussion...

        Anyway grepping through the docs produced

        perldiag.pod: (P) The foreach iterator got called in a non-loop context frame.

        (I didn't say "call frame")

        But the C code is quite hard for me too understand without more conceptual basics... which are fuzzy ...

        Cheers Rolf

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://833062]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-11-29 08:02 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:

    Results (204 votes), past polls