Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re: Choose a maximum for Rep

by footpad (Monsignor)
on May 25, 2001 at 20:41 UTC ( #83348=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Choose a maximum for Rep

In an attempt to spark a better idea, what if we consider borrowing an idea from (Heaven help me) /.? Namely, the ability to flag nodes with certain attributes, such as "Insightful," "Funny,", "Underrated," "Overrated," "Interesting," "FAQ", and so on?

If pursued, I'd see this as:

  • Being a Level Power (say Level 6 or 7, to provide cues to other senior members that this may be a node needing extra attention).

    The idea here being that it should only be available to folks who've been around long enough to fairly assess the "properties" of a node.

  • Briefly summarized in Index pages underneath the posters name. For example:

    Choose a maximum for Rep
    on May 24, 2001 at 17:37
    2 replies by lemming

    Note that this only requires the addition of a <BR> tag and a description.

  • Summarized in threaded views after the post date.

    For example:

    Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
    by chipmunk on May 24, 2001 at 18:34, Insightful, Underrated

    (Apologies for to chipmunk for borrowing his node for example purposes. No offense intended.)

  • Specifically summarized only to the poster when viewed in its own window, again in the header, e.g.:

    Re: Re: Choose a maximum for Rep

    by chipmunk on May 24, 2001 at 20:28
    Insightful (3), Underrated (2)
  • If done properly, this add more information about the community's reaction to a node, as well as more drugs for the addicted.

    I realize that this is a very ambitious proposal, one needing further analysis and a lot of work to implement. However, it might be a workable solution.

    Note: Please realize that I offer this as a possible solution to a problem that I do not believe exists. I do not think the current voting system is broken. I simply think it's not being used wisely.

    Thoughts? Feedback?


  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Node Status?
    node history
    Node Type: note [id://83348]
    [Lady_Aleena]: Lax, that would take it down to a little less than 100 characters. The module name is nearly 80 characters long.
    Lady_Aleena has fumble fingers today.
    [Lady_Aleena]: Sorry for the name typo LanX.
    [LanX]: never lad_ena!
    [LanX]: ;)
    [Lady_Aleena]: IMO, Fancy::Join:: Grammatical isn't bad, but RolePlaying:: WorldBuilding:: WorldBuildersGuide book::ClimateTerra inSubsistance is on the long side.
    [Lady_Aleena]: I'm still in reorganizing/ renaming mode.

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others meditating upon the Monastery: (8)
    As of 2017-05-24 21:59 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?