Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: On Voting

by perigeeV (Hermit)
on May 26, 2001 at 04:41 UTC ( #83458=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to On Voting

A node's total reputation does not reflect its total merit because it can't. Since votes are blind the only thing reputation can signify is the number of people that found it held worth(or lack of). This seems overly obvious to me, am I missing something? This has to be a better quantifier than judging a node by some slide rule. If a SOPW caused interest within 50 voters, then 50 people have admitted that they are enriched somehow, no matter how trivial the subject. Are we judging what we read by some grand Monestary Code-For-All-The-Ages yardstick, or simply "That's cool stuff."

I recall a comment posted a few months back in the CB, "I'm surprised I just got 30 votes for a FAQ answer."

Like it or not there's always going to be clueless newbies. The Monestary has been better than most anywhere when it comes to displaying patience with FAQ answers. I'd hazard to say that is a very real reason it has become so popular. I think enough people have been kicked in the ass on some newsgroup that they'll reward a patient explanation of a FAQ answer. Not that I've ever asked a stupid question, of course...:)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://83458]
[erix]: fortunately, the idiots make for good entertainment as well: trumps chumps
[Corion]: Meh, stupid people are associated with every president
[Corion]: (or presidential candidate)
[Corion]: And if you only have two candidates, you can expect some of the stupid people to make the "right" choice by chance ;)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-01-24 08:32 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?

    Results (203 votes). Check out past polls.