in reply to
Re: Correct idiom for default parameters
in thread Correct idiom for default parameters
Good points. Understand though, that this bears almost no resemblance to my "real" code. I was attempting to put together the absolute minimum necessary to demonstrate the question and my intentions. And no, my real package isn't called "Test" :)
For the most part, the sub routines in question take one parameter and it's optional. I think there's one (maybe two) subroutines that take two where the first is mandatory, and the second is optional. I'd have to look again, as I forget off the top of my head. I do appreciate the input though.