Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

by Herkum (Parson)
on May 05, 2010 at 19:23 UTC ( #838559=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?
in thread Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

Besides which, running Perl::Critic on old code is going to dishearten folk, not make them happier

Take a look at Test::Perl::Critic::Progressive. It addresses the issue with having to maintain legacy code without it having to fail critic policies. Of course if someone goes in and starts changing that code the test will look at it and fail it if the new code does not support current coding standards.

It is a good bridge between legacy and new code.

  • Comment on Re^3: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://838559]
help
Chatterbox?
shmem compiles himself into his template

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (12)
As of 2017-06-25 20:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (570 votes). Check out past polls.