Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: redefining Internals::SvREADONLY

by rir (Vicar)
on May 05, 2010 at 19:40 UTC ( #838561=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to redefining Internals::SvREADONLY

You might consider Class::InsideOut.

Be well,

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: redefining Internals::SvREADONLY
by moritz (Cardinal) on May 06, 2010 at 13:57 UTC
    If you have to worry about developers poking the internals of your objects, and you can't get control of it by social means, you also have to worry that those same developers might use PadWalker to penetrate the barrier that inside-out objects build to protect their privacy.

    As was pointed out several time this is a social problem, and probably can't be solved by technical means.

Re^2: redefining Internals::SvREADONLY
by ChiefAl (Initiate) on May 06, 2010 at 13:48 UTC
    that looks promising in the future... thanks

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://838561]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2016-12-09 03:26 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:

    Results (148 votes). Check out past polls.