Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Forcing Compile Time Checking That Subs Exist

by bikeNomad (Priest)
on Jun 05, 2001 at 01:12 UTC ( #85614=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Forcing Compile Time Checking That Subs Exist
in thread Forcing Compile Time Checking That Subs Exist

Keep the faith, Brother!

Having been a Smalltalk user for at least 5 years now, one thing that helps in typical Smalltalk environments is their checking of method names when you define new methods. Every time you edit a method, it's recompiled; the compiler does a simple check to see if any of the method names you're using haven't been defined yet. If so, you get a warning. This has helped me detect a lot of typos in my code.

I'm thinking that a similar strategy could be used with Perl, by scanning programs like this:

  • For each 'use'd or 'require'd package, make a defined symbol list (easiest way to do this is probably just to use B::Xref).
  • Scan your program for method calls (or, more simply, for words, removing all the Perl pre-defined words).
  • Make a list of all the method calls (or words) in your program that don't match any of the subroutines defined in your included packages

This is a simple strategy, and it should be easy to implement. Tell me if it works!

I still prefer full testing, though. Have you read anything about Extreme Programming techniques? One of the XP tenets is to write tests FIRST.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Forcing Compile Time Checking That Subs Exist

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://85614]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-29 19:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (226 votes), past polls