Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks

by bronto (Priest)

on Aug 20, 2010 at 14:47 UTC ( #856286=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

Thanks for the suggestion! Is it possible to do it in a way that I can capture the content of the comment?

Ciao!
--bronto

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Comment on Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments
Re^3: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by ikegami (Pope) on Aug 20, 2010 at 14:58 UTC
Then it's not a comment at all (i.e. it's meaningful), and you'd match it like anything else (i.e. not use `<skip>`).	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by bronto (Priest) on Aug 23, 2010 at 10:53 UTC
That's what I tried to do, actually, e.g. adding an InlineComment rule, but I failed. Do you know the correct way to do this? Thanks! Ciao! `--bronto` In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.	[reply]
Re^5: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments by ikegami (Pope) on Aug 23, 2010 at 17:34 UTC
You didn't post that code, so I can't help you find what's wrong with it.	[reply]

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://856286]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (9)

As of 2013-06-19 10:09 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?