Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Would you work at a porn company?

by JavaFan (Canon)
on Nov 14, 2010 at 22:47 UTC ( #871374=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Would you work at a porn company?

I would not turn down the job because of content. But I wouldn't take the job if I wasn't sure if they weren't "ethical". The porn industry has a dubious reputation. I would have to be sure they wouldn't be involved in spamming, malware, nasty javascript, annoying popups, etc, etc. And on the non-technical aspect, I would to be made sure they aren't involved in anyway in forcing models to do what they do not want to do. I have turned down jobs because of that reason (not from the porn industry, but from the industry that's pushing ringtones and expensive SMS-based games)

But I would not balk at the content.

Besides, I've worked for banks. That got to be worse than porn.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Would you work at a porn company?
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 15, 2010 at 00:46 UTC
    Besides, I've worked for banks. That got to be worse than porn.

    Thats a hair away from working for Hitler

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://871374]
help
Chatterbox?
[choroba]: Be kind to people using old Perl with newer version of the module
[Corion]: But why not simply specify 'List::Util' => 1.29 in your prerequisites? People might install a more recent version of the module into their Perl
[Corion]: (what choroba said)
[Discipulus]: ah! simpler and cleaner
[Discipulus]: thanks! use List::Util 1.29 qw(pairmap ... just works!
Discipulus is preparing another of his CUFP..

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-05-25 09:27 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?