Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re^6: Site facelift?

by herveus (Parson)
on Nov 18, 2010 at 13:29 UTC ( #872241=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^5: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?


How is "refusal to adopt an acknowledged trend" a meaningful criticism? That's absurd.

The site is not "ugly". It is highly functional and stable. You don't have to keep learning new quirks and unpleasant behavior on a weekly basis. This is not and should not be FaceBook. Change is incremental and deliberate. That is a Good Thing.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Site facelift?
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 31, 2011 at 11:08 UTC
    ...It is highly functional and stable...

    Absolutely. Functionality and stability trumps fresh/cool/snazzy all day long.

    Making this website more responsive (ie faster) would be very welcome, but the benefit probably wouldn't be drastic -- programming is hard and requires careful and thoughtful responses, humans can only go so fast :)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://872241]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (5)
As of 2016-10-23 11:13 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (301 votes). Check out past polls.