Re^2: Simpler than XML::Simple

[Jenda]

in reply to Re: Simpler than XML::Simple
in thread Simpler than XML::Simple

"Must have an XML schema" ... get real! Yeah, you might have a schema. And the schema migh even be reasonable. Quite often it's not. Ever heard for example of HR-XML? What a ... massive overcomplicated schema. With each company using different parts of the schema. A mess.

There is never "the only solution".

[Anonymous Monk]

Well, the real world ... my experience is that it's hard to get just well-formed and correctly encoded XML files from external parties.

Did you know that the "trang" tool is capable of creating a schema out of sample data? So I don't see the advantage with using XML::Smart.

[Jenda]

I don't see the advantage with using XML::Smart either :-)

[Anonymous Monk]

Ah, I meant XML::Rules :-)

I just tried to convert the sample XML from XML::Rules' SYNOPSIS into a schema:

trang test.xml test.rnc

And the result:

default namespace = ""

start =
  element doc {
    element person {
      element fname { xsd:NMTOKEN },
      element lname { xsd:NMTOKEN },
      element email { xsd:NMTOKEN },
      element address {
        element street { xsd:NMTOKEN },
        element city { xsd:NMTOKEN },
        element country { xsd:NMTOKEN },
        element bogus { xsd:NMTOKEN }
      },
      element phones {
        element phone {
          attribute type { xsd:NCName },
          xsd:NMTOKEN
        }+
      }
    }+
  }

Which looks quite reasonable. trang can also convert into .xsd files, which look uglier but are needed for XML::Compile operation.